Yuno vs Tuna: Which Payment Orchestration Platform Is Right for Your Business?

As digital commerce grows across regions and industries, merchants face increasing complexity in managing multiple payment providers, local methods, fraud tools, and operational workflows.

Payment orchestration platforms simplify this environment — but not all solutions offer the same depth, scalability, or global readiness.

Two platforms often compared are Yuno and Tuna. Both support multi-provider connectivity, routing and payment optimization, but their scope, coverage, and enterprise capabilities vary significantly.

‍

Understanding Payment Orchestration

Payment orchestration platforms connect a merchant’s entire payments stack — acquirers, gateways, alternative payment methods, anti-fraud tools, and value-added services — into one unified layer.

This allows businesses to:

• Scale into new markets faster
• Improve approval rates
• Reduce operational overhead
• Gain unified intelligence and analytics
• Integrate new payment methods with minimal engineering effort

‍

Yuno: The Global AI-Driven Orchestration Platform

Yuno is designed for merchants that operate across multiple regions, currencies, verticals and regulatory environments.

With coverage in 200+ countries and access to 1,000+ payment methods, it delivers the breadth and enterprise-grade features required by global organizations.

‍

Key strengths of Yuno:

• True global reach: coverage across LATAM, EMEA, APAC and North America.
• AI-powered smart routing: automated optimization, retries, recovery agents and fraud intelligence.
• Full enterprise lifecycle: disputes, pre-chargeback alerts, reconciliation, payouts, subscriptions, analytics.
• Direct scheme & acquirer integrations: network tokens, 3DS, Click to Pay, direct acquirer links.
• One integration for global scale: local payment methods, multi-region routing, SOC 2 / ISO compliance.

Yuno positions itself as a complete payments operating system, built to support global expansion at scale.

‍

Tuna: LATAM-Focused Payment Orchestration

Tuna, founded in Brazil, is a payment hub and orchestration platform mainly focused on Latin America.

It specializes in local acquiring, fraud tools, and payment routing for merchants operating in Brazil and nearby markets.

‍

Strengths of Tuna:

• Deep LATAM expertise: strong connectivity to Brazilian and Latin American acquirers.
• Local payment rails: PIX, boleto, local cards, regional processors.
• Modular platform: gateway, anti-fraud and orchestration components.
• Checkout and risk tools: optimized for digital merchants with LATAM-first needs.

‍

Limitations:

• Regional focus: limited global coverage outside LATAM.
• Enterprise lifecycle gaps: lacks global-grade tools like multi-currency settlement, disputes, payouts, and reconciliation.
• Not ideal for global scale: infrastructure built primarily for domestic LATAM rails.

‍

Feature Comparison: Yuno vs Tuna

‍

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Platform for Future-Ready Payments

Tuna is a strong option for merchants focused mainly on LATAM, especially those needing deep local connectivity and domestic methods in Brazil.

But if your business operates across multiple regions, currencies and industries, or plans to expand beyond LATAM, Yuno provides a broader, AI-driven orchestration platform with the enterprise capabilities required for global growth.

Yuno helps boost approval rates, accelerate global expansion, and centralize your payments ecosystem — all through a single, future-ready integration.